A comparative Analysis of Tafseer Tafhīm‑ul‑Qur’ān and Al‑Kawthar fi Tafsīr al‑Qur’ān in the context of (Apparent) Conflicting Verses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/Keywords:
Holy Qur’an, Apparent Contradiction , Revelation , ExegesesAbstract
Islam presents a comprehensive code of life, and the final revealed book, the Holy Qur’an, remains a perpetual source of guidance for humanity until the Day of Judgment. Although certain verses may appear to conflict at first glance, this paper argues that no genuine contradictions exist within the Qur’an. Employing a descriptive‐analytical methodology, the study draws upon the tafsirs of the distinguished Sub-continent scholars Maulana Syed Abul A’la Maududi and Allama Sheikh Mohsin Ali Najafi, both of whom assert, through rigorous argumentation, that the Qur’an is entirely free from contradictions. After providing a concise introduction to these mufassireen and their exegetical works, the paper selects and analyses four instances of apparently contradictory verses. Grounded in narrations of the Holy Prophet (SAWS) and the experts’ fiqh knowledge, both Maududi and Najafi offer coherent reconciliations that demonstrate the consistency and integrity of Qur’anic revelation. The findings aim to clarify misunderstandings and reinforce the Qur’an’s role as an enduring, coherent guidance for believers.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 AL-JAMEI Research Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
